Search This Blog



Is Gibson Voter Fraud Being Ignored?

By CNHT | August 4, 2016

by Ed Naile

CNHT has been racking and documenting voter fraud since 2000. This case is a prime example of how voter fraud is accepted and ignored by the parties you would normally expect to prosecute and expose it.

Carl Robert Gibson is one of many outside activists who come to NH every election cycle. At least 1200 from Massachusetts alone came this past Presidential Primary. You can check the websites of Democrat groups in several New England states and see for yourself how they carpool here and meet up with NH campaigners.

Gibson had a car with two year expired Connecticut plates and a Kentucky drivers license that just expired in June of this year when he was arrested for posing, with a faked press release, as a Republican candidate in a special election. It was a blatant effort to use a fake statement that the candidate was dropping out of the race days before the vote.

This political “prankster” was registered and voting in other states since 2012 when he came here to work against Congressman Frank Guinta – paid by CREDO PAC, a left wing PAC out of California. He registered as a Republican.

As you can see by the court documents posted below, NH took no action to investigate Gibson for using email in an attempt to sabotage an election. His computer was not confiscated, no witnesses were interviewed, no statements taken. The NH AG relied on a Concord Monitor reporter’s story as its sole evidence. The Monitor reporter documents how he caught Gibson and has no sources to hide but was granted a Motion to Quash by Judge McNamara so he does not have to testify. End of case – EXCEPT! Judge McNamara has also decided that two statutes also involved with this case are “overly broad” which they are not, thereby leaving the door open for the AG to drop the case.

What these friends of Gibson are doing is a very tight little ballet that has to work perfectly or else Gibson goes before a jury. If a jury gets the evidence who knows what would happen.

There you have it but for one other fact: I have submitted a 17 page Amicus Brief in this case which the AG has opposed in writing but the judge has not ruled on. I document how Gibson has done things like this in other states and his long arrest record and interstate voting record.

Let’s see if Judge McNamara keeps ignoring my brief – which is now public record.

If anyone had any doubts about which side the Monitor is on when it comes to proven voter fraud, here it is.

Order on Gibson Case [PDF]

Topics: Vote Fraud | Comments Off

Attacks on O’Keefe Focus of UL Article

By CNHT | July 11, 2016

Sometimes you trust and rely on the mainstream media and their “journalists” to print the story. But it is never without a slant.

Lately, it seems that we live in a bizarro upside-down world where wrong is right, down is up, and bad is good.

Witness the UL’s coverage given to CNHT’s annual event which featured whistleblower and crime fighter James O’Keefe of Project Veritas.

James has been working on exposing a variety of issues related to government corruption, not the least of which is the voter and election fraud that seems to have taken place in NH with votes cast by non-residents with improper domiciles, individuals who engaged in double voting, or illegal participation of foreign parties in US campaigns.

For example, O’Keefe produced a series of videos on how easily one could fake an identity, taking names from recent obituaries in order to procure a ballot. Although he demonstrated how this could be done, but never intended to vote or even actually took a ballot, he was accused by the NH AG of a crime, with an immediate attempt to arrest him upon his return to NH.

Somehow, this backward behavior on the part of NH’s election officials seems to be reinforced and encouraged by the press (i.e. arrest the whistle blower and ignore the perpetrators).

In addition to hearing nothing about the fact that members of the Australian Labor Party were clearly engaging in paid election work in the US, which is illegal, reporter Mike Cousineau wrote “Assistant Attorney General Brian Buonamano last week said he recently inherited the O’Keefe case and that it remains an active investigation. “It’s currently under my review,” he said.

Is the UL referring to an investigation of the impropriety of the Australian Labor Party working in a US election and the fake domiciles, or, are they talking about a continued attempt to investigate O’Keefe himself? It almost suggests the latter, and we’ve contacted the reporter for clarification.

Further, it was reported that “In 2013, O’Keefe agreed to pay $100,000 to a former employee of ACORN to settle a lawsuit for being secretly interviewed in 2009, according to Politico. The videos O’Keefe made led to the collapse of ACORN, which helped register voters and organize campaigns in low-income areas, Politico said. Keefe was accused of unfairly editing the videos.”

Seems that officials were more concerned with whether O’Keefe had the right to tape someone (expectation of privacy rule) rather than the fact that ACORN had committed fraud in the way they were registering voters, or that ACORN was forced to shut down and change its name.

As far as we know, the only editing that is done is when clips are shortened for getting to the meat of the matter, but never has there been an attempt to alter the raw facts seen in the video, which are damning enough alone. Longer versions are always available.

It is not surprising that the UL quotes comments from two members of academia, including Jeff Sharlet who writes for “GQ” which is a men’s fashion magazine. (GQ’s self description is “The definitive men’s magazine, with style advice and tips, sexy women, entertainment and culture news, interviews, and more.”) Sharlet suggested that citizen journalists are not good at “working sources and contextualization”, which might suggest he thinks that these videos are lacking in facts or do not speak for themselves. But the comment from Rep. David Bates, R-Windham suggests that legislators have the problem of election fraud in NH under control.

The sad fact is, they do not.

Topics: Media Gaffes, Social News, Vote Fraud | Comments Off

CNHT Picnic and Straw Poll Results

By CNHT | July 9, 2016

Coalition of NH Taxpayers
8 North Main Street #4
Concord, NH 03301

For Immediate Release
July 9, 2016

CNHT Annual Taxpayer Picnic
Results of Straw Poll

Manchester, NH — The Coalition of NH Taxpayers held its Annual Taxpayer Reunion Picnic on Saturday, July 9, 2016 from 12 PM – 3 PM at the American Legion #2 in Manchester, NH.

This year’s keynote speaker was James O’Keefe of Project Veritas.

A graduate of Rutgers University, James O’Keefe is an award-winning journalist and writer. He is the founder and President of both Project Veritas and Project Veritas Action, non-profit organizations dedicated to investigating corruption, dishonesty, waste and fraud in both public and private institutions.

James O’Keefe’s investigations have led directly to the passage of new legislation, federal and state investigations, congressional inquiries, the defunding of taxpayer-funded groups, resignations, firings, retrainings and disciplinary action.

Candidates for NH Governor, US Senate and both Congressional Districts, as well as candidates for NH Senate and House were in attendance and spoke to a crowd of about 200. State candidates who have taken the CNHT Tax Pledge will have their names posted online sometime before the September primary.

A straw poll was taken with these results: (more detailed tallies will be added later)

Frank Edelblut – 113*
Chris Sununu – 46
Ted Gatsas – 24
Mike Gill – 4

Kelly Ayotte – 79*
Jim Rubens – 78
Aaron Day – 16

Frank Guinta – 81*
Rich Ashooh – 77
Brendan Kelly – 13

Jim Lawrence – 112*
John Babiarz – 15
Jack B. Flanagan – 13

Topics: Social News, Tea Party News, The Pledge | Comments Off

« Previous Entries