by Ed Naile
A week ago Friday I was down in Lexington Mass as a guest speaker for what is the Massachusetts version of Grover Norquist’s “Wednesday Meeting.”
This was my fourth trip down there and they say I hold the record because it seems the Massachusetts activists love to see the voter fraud evidence from NH, inside NH political intrigue, and all things Granite State. I have also been invited to do some Ma. talk radio (Hope we take calls.) and a cable TV show from this event.
It is always fun to have people come up and ask about their former neighbor who moved to some town in NH. Most often that person is now a good example of what we need more of – an activist for smaller government.
I was telling them about the court case where a superior court judge granted an ACLU/League of Women Liberal Voters petition that essentially sets up dual citizenship for voting, presumably college students only, not summer people who own NH property and who might vote for my causes.
No sooner did I get home than I got my notice from the Strafford Superior Court that the final hearing will be July 3, 2013.
I have 15 minutes.
At least I get that.
Think of all the out of state tuition college student voters from out of state who will be denied a chance to go to the hearing because they will be back home – where they live, and pay out of state tuition from?
How unconstitutional to set a date for an event the people most effected can not attend.
In Durham alone about 7,000 non-resident students – from out of state – will have to sit across state lines watching helplessly as their right to vote in NH and pick and choose which place they can cast a vote more effectively – hangs in the balance.
Ed Naile | 4 Comments | Share Article
From My Chubby, Don’t Giva Damn Hands…
Friday, January 25, 2013 at 01:36 PM
If anything has “dried up over time” it is California Senator Diane Feinstein.
She lives in a state where she has no fear of losing power so she is free to tamper with constitutional rights at will.
Her proposal exposes all the concerns of gun owner and patriots regarding government attempts to confiscate guns from citizens and criminalize their ownership.
I have a nice “farm patina” .22 rifle made by Sears in 1972. At the time it cost $19.95. Now it is worth a bunch of money because it is “tube fed.”
I can slip 24 .22 shorts in the tube and it will fire as fast as you can pull the trigger. It is semi-automatic.
There is no way I would ever give this gun to any government pant load.
Australian friends of mine told me, back when their country took advantage of a crisis, that government agents came to their houses and cut their guns up with carbide saws. One guy, Kerry Head, said he watched his grandfather’s shot gun get cut up.
That will not happen here in America.
No, wait, I may be wrong.
That won’t happen very long in America or you will see a reverse crisis.
If Senator Feinstein wants to go for the third rail and drag some other moonbats along, be my guest.
Her pal Barack Obama garnered something like 7 million votes less than he did in first coming, with a billion of traceable and tons of secret non-profit dollars spent.
The next election may look like it is a slam dunk from the Organizing for America perspective – but the public will know who you are next time.
Ed Naile | 2 Comments | Share Article
Trouble On Tap
Friday, January 25, 2013 at 12:52 PM
Nothing like a public/private corporation to hide public information, I mean, isn’t that why we create them in the first place?
“NASHUA – Workers at Pennichuck Corp. were denied a permanent injunction by a judge to bar the publication of their names and salaries, but the public still won’t get to see the information.
That’s because Judge Jacalyn Colburn decided that Pennichuck Corp., sold to the city of Nashua in February, is not considered a public body as defined under the state’s right-to-know law.
The decision, entered this week in Hillsborough County Superior Court, may bring an end to the lawsuit filed by United Steelworkers, ALF-CIO, which represents a majority of Pennichuck Corp. workers.”
Judge says Pennichuck not subject to state’s right-to-know law
Here is the problem, or list of problems.
The City of Nashua used taxpayer money to buy a private water company, so they could “run it better.”
Notice the distinction – the city used taxpayer money. The city has no money, they take it from people who live inside their city limits and water district boundaries if need be.
1. The City of Nashua governing bodies made a deal with a private company, presented to taxpayers as one thing, and now we find it is another – so far.
2. Some disgruntled steel workers did not want their names and salaries posted in public. They lost the case they brought but in the end of this decision, won what they wanted – so far.
3. A Superior Court Judge apparently doesn’t know anything about the Right to Know Law, RSA 91-A – or maybe she does.
4. Off to the State Supreme Court for a new Pennichuck decision regarding public/private which should mirror the LGC case just decided against LGC and still in flux.
We have the same old New Hampshire pit fall.
1. Voters go and buy something with taxpayer money they have no business buying.
2. Once the purchase is over and all the behind the scenes deals are complete, the parties have divided up the loot and power, taxpayers find out the real story.
3. Once someone finds out they have been screwed they go to court.
5. In court, a judge gets an opportunity to re-write any law they want to suit themselves and their pals – remember, not that long ago we impeached a supreme court judge for rigging a divorce of another judge.
6. Everyone pays to trot off to the supreme court for a ruling most anyone could have predicted would happen.
Court in New Hampshire is not where you go for justice.
It is where you give judges an opportunity to do what they please, so the Legislature can follow along like a guy with a shovel after a parade.