Did the governor of NH really think he had to ask the supreme court if requiring proof of residency to vote was constitutional?<\/p>\n
What is NH coming to?<\/p>\n
by Ed Naile<\/em><\/p>\n As NH one again descends into the nonsensical debate over a word not even in the New Hampshire State Constitution regarding the qualifications of voters, that would be the word \u201cresident,\u201d the arguments of the pro-voter fraud crowd get even more foolish.<\/p>\n Take the claim that having a legal resident of our state actually hold a valid driver\u2019s license here is the same as having a \u201cpoll tax.\u201d<\/p>\n Huh?<\/p>\n It is the law and it is a fact that a permanent resident of New Hampshire must declare a specific street address as his domicile either to vote or drive in this state. Just because NH election officials have a political agenda that engages legislators in word games while they look the other way and non-residents vote here does not change the reality of the situation.<\/p>\n But our people in charge of New Hampshire state colleges certainly charge out-of-state residents out-of-state resident tuition because those out-of-state residents can not legally state they have a New Hampshire domicile. Check the NH Residency Form For In-State College Tuition.<\/p>\n Instate Residency Form<\/a><\/p>\n So out-of-state resident college tuition must be a FOOL TAX?<\/strong><\/p>\n Why would anyone pay out-of-state resident college tuition in New Hampshire if the words \u201cdomicile\u201d and \u201cresident\u201d are used in the same state form? Is it even legal to charge out-of-state college tuition? Or are NH election officials and colleges cherry picking where they choose to play their word games?<\/p>\n Court Hears From 10 Parties on Voting Rights Bill<\/a><\/p>\n
\nShould we pay out-of-state resident college students back for defrauding them?<\/p>\n