{"id":165,"date":"2008-08-11T13:47:36","date_gmt":"2008-08-11T17:47:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/?p=165"},"modified":"2008-08-14T13:55:09","modified_gmt":"2008-08-14T17:55:09","slug":"new-vote-on-swanzey-teacher-pact-sept-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/2008\/08\/11\/new-vote-on-swanzey-teacher-pact-sept-9\/","title":{"rendered":"New vote on Swanzey teacher pact Sept. 9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>August 11, 2008<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.unionleader.com\/article.aspx?articleId=221263ba-06d3-4f52-bdb1-ec4be6aac5e3&#038;headline=New+vote+on+Swanzey+teacher+pact+Sept.+9\">Union Leader<\/a><\/p>\n<p>SWANZEY \u2013 Teachers in the Monadnock Regional School District are one step closer to a new contract after voters at a special deliberative session on Saturday unanimously agreed to put the negotiated contract up for a special vote on September 9.<\/p>\n<p>Teachers in the Monadnock Regional School District have been working without a contract for three years, and in March, voters rejected another agreement between the district and the teachers&#8217; union.<\/p>\n<p>However, after the March vote, signs of labor unrest within the district became apparent when several dozen teachers launched a one-day sick-out. To calm the waters, the school board and the union immediately entered into a new round of negotiations, and within a month had come up with a new contract.<\/p>\n<p>The district, through Attorney Paul L. Apple of Upton and Hatfield, petitioned the Cheshire County Superior Court for permission to hold a special district meeting, and on July 14, Judge Brian T. Tucker approved the district&#8217;s request. Tucker set the date of the vote for Sept. 9, also primary day in New Hampshire.<\/p>\n<p>Because the district follows official ballot voting rules (SB 2), a deliberative session had to be held 28 days prior to the September vote. The Monadnock School Taxpayers Association had attempted to squelch the deliberative session &#8212; first by filing a motion for reconsideration, which Tucker rejected, and then by filing a request for an injunction which was also denied.<\/p>\n<p>On Saturday, 115 people from throughout the district turned out at the high school to discuss the contract that calls for the appropriation of $680,306 to fund salaries, step increases, and other benefits. According to school board chairman Gene White, the appropriation would cost the owner of a $200,000 home an average of $118 for the first year of the contract. The tax impact would be less for the two consecutive years of the contract.<\/p>\n<p>Near the beginning of the session, an amendment was offered that would eliminate any early retirement benefits from the contract. After a ballot vote, the amendment was soundly defeated by a vote of 103 to 12.<\/p>\n<p>Following the vote on the amendment, several people took to the microphone in support of the contract.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We need to show our community support for the teachers, and we need to show our community support for public education,&#8221; said Bruce Barlow of Swanzey. &#8220;Let&#8217;s try to get this thing passed and move on.&#8221; Pete Majoy of Richmond called the Monadnock School Taxpayers&#8217; Association to account for spreading propaganda year after year in order to defeat the teachers&#8217; contracts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You need to do research on these people who are organized year after year to fight the contracts,&#8221; said Majoy. &#8220;Much of this organization is people who share an ideology that is not friendly towards public schools, period.&#8221; However, school board member Jim Carney, a member of the association, said he opposed the contract because of the inclusion of benefits such as limited early retirement payments.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is not my position that teachers shouldn&#8217;t get raises,&#8221; Carney said. &#8220;My problem is all the extra additions to it.&#8221; &#8220;We don&#8217;t hate teachers. We think you&#8217;re doing a good job,&#8221; said school board member Tim Aho, also a member of the taxpayers&#8217; association. &#8220;Our problem is with the contract.&#8221; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>August 11, 2008 Union Leader SWANZEY \u2013 Teachers in the Monadnock Regional School District are one step closer to a new contract after voters at a special deliberative session on Saturday unanimously agreed to put the negotiated contract up for a special vote on September 9. Teachers in the Monadnock Regional School District have been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3,43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles-nh","category-special-elections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnht.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}