Search This Blog


Pages

Links

Trump’s Executive Order

By CNHT | July 10, 2017

Executive Order 13799 of May 11, 2017

Establishment of Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to promote fair and honest Federal elections, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Establishment. The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (Commission) is hereby established.

Sec. 2. Membership. The Vice President shall chair the Commission, which shall be composed of not more than 15 additional members. The President shall appoint the additional members, who shall include individuals with knowledge and experience in elections, election management, election fraud detection, and voter integrity efforts, and any other individuals with knowledge or experience that the President determines to be of value to the Commission. The Vice President may select a Vice Chair of the Commission from among the members appointed by the President.

Sec. 3. Mission. The Commission shall, consistent with applicable law, study the registration and voting processes used in Federal elections. The Commission shall be solely advisory and shall submit a report to the President that identifies the following:

(a) those laws, rules, policies, activities, strategies, and practices that enhance the American people’s confidence in the integrity of the voting processes used in Federal elections;

(b) those laws, rules, policies, activities, strategies, and practices that undermine the American people’s confidence in the integrity of the voting processes used in Federal elections; and

(c) those vulnerabilities in voting systems and practices used for Federal elections that could lead to improper voter registrations and improper voting, including fraudulent voter registrations and fraudulent voting.

Sec. 4. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

(a) The term “improper voter registration” means any situation where an individual who does not possess the legal right to vote in a jurisdiction is included as an eligible voter on that jurisdiction’s voter list, regardless of the state of mind or intent of such individual.

(b) The term “improper voting” means the act of an individual casting a non-provisional ballot in a jurisdiction in which that individual is ineligible to vote, or the act of an individual casting a ballot in multiple jurisdictions, regardless of the state of mind or intent of that individual.

(c) The term “fraudulent voter registration” means any situation where an individual knowingly and intentionally takes steps to add ineligible individuals to voter lists.

(d) The term “fraudulent voting” means the act of casting a non-provisional ballot or multiple ballots with knowledge that casting the ballot or ballots is illegal.

Sec. 5. Administration. The Commission shall hold public meetings and engage with Federal, State, and local officials, and election law experts, as necessary, to carry out its mission. The Commission shall be informed by, and shall strive to avoid duplicating, the efforts of existing government entities. The Commission shall have staff to provide support for its functions.
Start Printed Page 22390

Sec. 6. Termination. The Commission shall terminate 30 days after it submits its report to the President.

Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) To the extent permitted by law, and subject to the availability of appropriations, the General Services Administration shall provide the Commission with such administrative services, funds, facilities, staff, equipment, and other support services as may be necessary to carry out its mission on a reimbursable basis.

(b) Relevant executive departments and agencies shall endeavor to cooperate with the Commission.

(c) Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.) (the “Act”), may apply to the Commission, any functions of the President under that Act, except for those in section 6 of the Act, shall be performed by the Administrator of General Services.

(d) Members of the Commission shall serve without any additional compensation for their work on the Commission, but shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, to the extent permitted by law for persons serving intermittently in the Government service (5 U.S.C. 5701-5707).

(e) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(f) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(g) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE, May 11, 2017. Filed 5-15-17; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2017-10003
Billing code 3295-F7-P

Topics: Vote Fraud | Comments Off

The ACLU Sues Trump Over Lack of Transparency – of Election Integrity Commission.

By CNHT | July 10, 2017

Absolute Genius!! The ACLU Sues Trump Over Lack of Transparency – of Election Integrity Commission.
by Ed Naile

I don’t have to read the whole thing. The headline says it all.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/aclu-sues-trump-over-election-commissions-lack-of-transparency/ar-BBE9uyG

The brain trust that is the NH ACLU is suing New Hampshire so already watered-down, useless, public information on NH voter checklists, submitted to the NH Statewide Database they wanted so much, isn’t sent to the Trump’s Election Integrity Commission.
Ready for this?

The American ACLU is suing President Trump for lack of transparency in the Commission’s function so far. No quote of a law was given by the writer of the article or ACLU spokesman.

Here is half the story, which is not much:
“The American Civil Liberties Union on Monday said it had filed a lawsuit against U.S. President Donald Trump’s election commission, saying it had failed to follow federal law governing public access and transparency for such advisory groups.”

What the Commission should do is offer the American ACLU total transparency so the NH ACLU can sue them to stop it.
End of story.

Topics: Vote Fraud | Comments Off

Socialist Bernie Sanders Has a Democrat Primary Opponent in Vermont!

By CNHT | July 10, 2017

Socialist Bernie Sanders Has a Democrat Primary Opponent in Vermont!
by Ed Naile

In a pathetically liberal state run by New Yorkers and rich Connecticut elites, anyone wishing to run against the establishment must do more than take the Socialist Party Purity Pledge. (New Hampshire something not similar called the “Taxpayer Protection Pledge.”)

In Vermont, to even stand a chance against a lifetime appointment Senator like Sanders you need something else, something endearing to all Vermonters, no it’s not just a New York accent. To garner total voter obedience your signature style must to be more substantive and I think Senator Sander’s primary opponent has it!

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/bernie-sanders-faces-feisty-democratic-challenger-n780861

The challenger in question – doesn’t comb his hair! That is a huge plus in Vermont – just look at Bernie.

Bernie’s challenger is a guy named Jon Svitavsky. He is described in the article above by NBC reporter Alex Seitz-Wald as a homeless advocate. I am not sure yet how that description fits. Is he a HOMELESS advocate or an ADVOCATE for the homeless? (And expert proof readers who comment on my articles call ME on my writing.)

More fun facts regarding Jon, not John, Svitavsky.

He “graduated” from the phony college Bernie’s wife ran into oblivion!

And Saturday Night Live hasn’t done a sketch on this yet? SNL has been out of material for decades and this might be their last great hope – plus, Vermonters still watch that show. Can you believe it?

Normally there are no real primaries in Vermont. Sure, you have the traditional lineup of extra fringy fringe candidates who are permitted posture rights at the debates so they can dress up in funny hats – but not threaten the lefty heavyweights. Jon Svitavsky must understand this from the way things are run on the Democrat side.

The last time anyone ran a real campaign against a Vermont US Senator a cartoon candidate popped up to primary the Republican and cut him out. His name was simply “Fred.”

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/e98/vt/vt001.htm

“Fred” was set up to damage a serious Republican candidate against Democrat? US Senator Leahy. Fred actually won so Leahy and the progressives had a great time with the joke.

But now in 2017 the joke is on Vermont and the Democrat Party because a guy with a lousy NY accent who can’t comb his hair cost the Democrats a chance to win the White House. Not to mention he isn’t a Democrat but the progressives had to let him run in their primary.

Pretty funny stuff. God Bless Vermont and its wasted progressive votes. At least they are having fun?

Topics: Articles (US) | Comments Off

« Previous Entries Next Entries »